
The Owens family has a book full of magic and a rather significant gap in its family tree. That gap is where Practical Magic 2 gets interesting.
Among the sequel’s revelations is a detail with consequences far beyond its immediate usefulness to the plot. Tom Lockland shares an ancestor with the women he threatens. Hannah Owens, Maria’s mother, had another child. Tom descends from that branch, whose history never made it into the Book of Magic.
A missing family record sounds like the sort of thing a sequel might introduce to keep its mythology busy. Here, it makes the familiar Owens story feel painfully incomplete. The family has preserved its spells across generations while losing track of some of the people connected to them.
Spoilers for Practical Magic 2 follow.
The Family Story Starts Earlier Than We Thought
Maria Owens occupies an enormous amount of space in the family’s understanding of itself. Her heartbreak provides the explanation for the curse. Her name carries the authority of someone whose worst experience became everybody else’s inheritance.
Put Hannah beside her and that familiar origin acquires another generation of suffering.
The sequel connects Hannah to Lord Lockland and establishes a second line of descendants. Maria consequently becomes a daughter inside a troubled family history of her own. The story reaches back beyond the woman everyone remembers as its beginning.
That is a useful complication. Origin stories can make people strangely solitary. Give an ancestor one defining act and everything surrounding her gradually disappears. Her childhood becomes background. Her mother becomes a name.
Hannah’s place in the story pushes against that habit. We can still hold Maria responsible for the spell she cast while wondering what she inherited before she ever cast it.
The Book Has Become a Much Less Comfortable Object
The detail I keep coming back to is the missing entry.
Tom’s connection to Hannah and Lord Lockland was never recorded in the Book of Magic. The dialogue makes that omission explicit. An object carrying the authority of family knowledge turns out to contain only part of the family’s story.
There is something wonderfully awkward about that. An old family book invites trust almost automatically. Somebody kept it safe. Somebody thought its contents deserved to survive. Its age makes every page feel more authoritative.
Then a missing branch reminds us that preservation involves choices, accidents and gaps. We can know something was left out without knowing exactly who left it out or why.
The distinction matters here. Blaming Sally (Sandra Bullock) or the aunts for a centuries-old omission would be a leap. Reading the book as an incomplete record is enough to make the revelation unsettling.
That feels recognisably human. Every family has a version of its past that gets repeated until repetition starts to resemble proof. The Owens women happen to keep theirs beside instructions that actually work.
An Owens Without Magic Still Belongs to the Family Tree

Tom’s ancestry separates two things the series makes easy to associate with each other. He carries Owens blood while lacking the inherited magic available to its central women. His desire to take Kylie’s power makes that difference dangerous.
The women we follow make witchcraft feel inseparable from the family name. Their abilities shape the way they live and how other people treat them. It is easy to start treating magic as the family’s identifying feature.
Tom complicates that assumption simply by existing.
A family tree keeps growing beyond the people who embody its most famous trait. Some descendants will inherit an ability. Others will inherit stories about it. Imagine being raised with a claim to an extraordinary legacy and having nothing with which to demonstrate that claim.
There is an emotionally plausible grievance there. The sequel gives Tom access to it, and his behaviour turns grievance into entitlement.
That is where I find the family connection most effective. It gives his obsession a personal history without handing him moral permission. Sharing an ancestor with Kylie (Joey King) grants him no ownership of her body or her power. A missing inheritance offers a reason for resentment. He supplies the cruelty himself.
Sally’s Secret Makes the Old Omission Sting
Sally’s decision to erase her daughters’ memories of magic introduces another break in the transmission of family knowledge. Her children grow up with parts of their own lives withheld from them.
Set that beside the absent branch and the sequel begins to feel crowded with people who have received edited versions of their inheritance.
The circumstances differ. Sally acts out of fear for her daughters. The older gap has a far less certain explanation. Still, the juxtaposition makes her choice more uncomfortable.
Protection can leave somebody terribly unprepared.
The old family book creates a similar problem on a larger scale. Its omissions survive long enough to become somebody else’s surprise.
I like that the sequel gives this idea a physical home. A missing entry is small enough to overlook. The consequences can turn up generations later and demand an explanation nobody living possesses.
The Owens Family Gets Bigger and Harder to Romanticise

There is a temptation with Practical Magic to treat the Owens family as the household everybody wishes would adopt them. The closeness is part of its appeal. So is the feeling that its women understand something the neighbours have failed to grasp.
Tom’s place in the genealogy makes that affection more complicated. The family extends beyond the people we enjoy spending time with. It contains a descendant whose sense of injury has become a weapon.
That expansion gives the sequel a worthwhile question. How much can ancestry explain about a person before their choices take over?
Kylie and Tom share a connection to Hannah. What each does with that connection remains their own responsibility. Blood can establish the relationship. It has very little to say about whether somebody deserves your trust.
The missing branch leaves me wanting something unusually ordinary for this magical family. Somebody should update the book.
Put Hannah’s other child into the record. Preserve the uncomfortable connection. Give the next generation a chance to know where the trouble came from before it arrives at the door.

Rachel Sikkema is a New Zealand-based writer and creative entrepreneur who explores the intersection of film, culture, and modern relationships. Through her articles, she examines how stories shape the way we connect, love and see ourselves – all for God’s glory. When she’s not writing about film and television, she’s watching Dexter and The White Lotus for the third time.
