By Rachel Sikkema
Published November 9, 2026

John Malkovich is such an intriguing fit for Wild Horse Nine because he can make a dangerous man funny while keeping the danger alive. His voice carries its own little threat. His apparent calm invites you to lean closer. For Martin McDonagh’s story about a worn-down CIA officer, that combination gives the film someone whose company can be enjoyable and deeply uncomfortable within the same conversation.
He plays Chris opposite Sam Rockwell’s Lee, with the two agents travelling from Santiago to Easter Island shortly before Chile’s 1973 coup. Their relationship gives McDonagh another abrasive male double act to explore, and Malkovich brings a particularly useful quality to its centre. You can believe this man has spent years making terrible things sound perfectly reasonable.
The interesting part is how much feeling can emerge through that composed surface. Malkovich has always been good at making you watch someone you would probably avoid at dinner. Give that presence a failing body and a friendship with history, and there is plenty for McDonagh to work with.
That Voice Does Half the Damage
Some actors make a threat sound frightening by pushing harder. Malkovich can make one sound like a minor correction to your pronunciation.
There is something wonderfully irritating about his precision. He can linger over a word as though he has discovered a private defect in it. An ordinary remark acquires a peculiar emphasis. You start listening for the insult before it arrives.
That suits McDonagh’s dialogue, where people often use conversation to establish who gets to humiliate whom. A disagreement can carry years of resentment. Someone asks a reasonable question and receives an answer designed to make them regret opening their mouth.
Malkovich has the patience for this. He can let an ugly thought sit comfortably in a sentence. The character seems entirely at ease with himself, which leaves the audience doing the uncomfortable work.
For Chris, that ease matters. A career involving institutional power becomes more believable when the person exercising it sounds accustomed to being heard. He has had plenty of practice explaining himself. Other people have presumably had plenty of practice letting him finish.
McDonagh Gives His Oddness Somewhere to Go
Malkovich’s eccentricity is familiar enough that casting him can become a shortcut. Put him in a room, give him a strange speech, and everyone waits for the Malkovich moment.
Chris offers something more substantial for that screen presence to inhabit. His exhaustion gives the peculiar rhythms a human pressure. His thoughts belong to someone confronting the end of his life while still dragging his old habits around with him.
The film allows Chris to wander into reflections about animals, religion and mortality. His declining health and morphine use contribute to that drifting quality. Those details give Malkovich room to loosen the authority we associate with him, letting Chris seem intermittently distant from his own circumstances.
I find that a much richer use of him than simply handing him another speech about how clever he is. The pleasure comes from watching an actor associated with control play someone whose grip is becoming unreliable.
Even the familiar voice takes on a different possibility. A pause might contain contempt. It might also contain the effort required to gather the next thought.
Sam Rockwell Gives Him Someone to Push Against

Rockwell is an especially appealing partner because his energy tends to travel differently.
He can make restlessness visible. His characters often seem to be working something out through their bodies before they have decided what to say. Malkovich can hold attention through stillness. Put those instincts together and a conversation already has movement before anyone raises their voice.
That difference makes the Chris and Lee pairing feel promising at a basic, pleasurable acting level. You want to see who interrupts. You want to see who waits out the other man’s nonsense.
McDonagh’s friendships thrive on that sort of petty negotiation. Affection gets expressed through the freedom to be annoying. Familiarity means knowing exactly which remark will get a response, then making it anyway.
With Malkovich and Rockwell, the friendship can also carry unequal weight. Chris’s presence suggests someone used to setting the terms. Rockwell has the responsiveness to make Lee’s relationship with those terms interesting. A companion can indulge a difficult man for years and still reach a point where the indulgence hurts.
That is where a good double act starts to feel like a lived relationship. You can enjoy their rhythm while wondering what maintaining it has cost them.
His Screen History Follows Him Into the Room
There is a particular advantage to casting Malkovich as someone with a morally ugly past. Audiences already have a store of associations to draw on.
Think of the cultivated cruelty of Dangerous Liaisons. Think of how personally invasive he makes the menace in In the Line of Fire. He understands characters who enjoy having access to another person’s nerves.
Then there is Being John Malkovich, which turned his very identity into something strange enough to build a film around. His screen presence can accommodate absurdity without losing its adult seriousness. That is a fairly rare gift.
Those associations make Chris interesting before the film explains much about him. Malkovich arrives with the possibility of manipulation attached. A gentle manner deserves scrutiny. A joke might be a small act of aggression.
Yet his casting also leaves room for vulnerability to catch us off guard. We are accustomed to watching him unsettle other people. Seeing the same presence exposed to helplessness carries its own sting.
For me, that is the strongest reason to put him in McDonagh’s world. The writer can begin with our pleasure in Malkovich’s authority, then make that authority increasingly difficult for Chris to sustain.
Feeling Sorry for Chris Comes With Friction

A character like Chris needs an actor who can hold the audience’s attention through moral discomfort. Too much obvious pleading would make the emotional material feel cheaply purchased.
Malkovich has a useful reserve. You can imagine Chris finding an open request for sympathy embarrassing, perhaps even faintly vulgar. Feeling has to make its way through a personality that keeps getting in its own way.
There is something recognisable in that, even when the character’s history feels remote. People remain difficult when they are frightened. They repeat the joke. They pick an argument with the person who stayed.
McDonagh’s writing has often found pain in that stubbornness. Malkovich gives it an expressive face and a voice capable of treating distress as an inconvenience.
That makes him a compelling choice for Wild Horse Nine. He has the comic timing to make Chris entertaining company and the severity to keep his past present. When tenderness reaches such a man, it has a difficult personality to get through. Malkovich is exactly the actor who can make you want to stay and listen.

Rachel Sikkema is a New Zealand-based writer and creative entrepreneur who explores the intersection of film, culture, and modern relationships. Through her articles, she examines how stories shape the way we connect, love and see ourselves – all for God’s glory. When she’s not writing about film and television, she’s watching Dexter and The White Lotus for the third time.